Reasons, basing, and the normative collapse of logical pluralism

Logical pluralism is the view that there more than one correct logic. A key objection to logical it collapses into monism. The core of Collapse Objection only pluralist’s strongest logic does any genuine normative work; since a must do work, this means pluralist really monist, who committed her being true This paper considers neglected question in collapse debate: what for work? As well as having wider upshot connection between and normativity, grappling with provides new response on behalf pluralist. I suggest we should allow logics generate pro tanto reasons way bears not just combinations attitudes but how an agent’s are based another. motivates adopting principles weaker earn their keep. Rather ad hoc, these capture sense which good reasoning goes beyond consistency attitudes. Good also concerned